ISO/TS 16949:2009
vs
IATF 16949:2016
conversion tool
Select ISO/TS 16949:2009 clause
Please select...
0.1 General
0.2 Process approach
0.4 Compatibility with other management systems
1 Scope
1.1 General
1.2 Application
2 Normative references
3 Terms and definitions
4.1 General requirements
4.2.2 Quality manual
4.2.3 Control of documents
4.2.3.1 Engineering specifications
4.2.4 Control of records
4.2.4.1 Records retention
5.1 Management commitment
5.1.1 Process efficiency
5.2 Customer focus
5.3 Quality Policy
5.4.1 Quality objectives
5.4.1.1 Quality objectives — Supplemental
5.4.2 Quality management system planning
5.5.1 Responsibility and authority
5.5.1.1 Responsibility for quality
5.5.2.1 Customer representative
5.5.3 Internal communication
5.6 Management review
5.6.1.1 Quality management system performance
5.6.2 Review input
5.6.2.1 Review input — Supplemental
5.6.3 Review output
6.1 Provision of resources
6.2.1 General
6.2.2 Competence, training and awareness
6.2.2.1 Product design skills
6.2.2.3 Training on the job
6.2.2.4 Employee motivation and empowerment
6.3 Infrastructure
6.3.1 Plant, facility and equipment planning
6.3.2 Contingency plans
6.4 Working environment
6.4.1 Personnel safety to achieve conformity to product requirements
6.4.2 Cleanliness of premises
7.1 Planning product realization
7.1.1 Planning of product realization — Supplemental
7.1.2 Acceptance criteria
7.1.3 Confidentiality
7.1.4 Change control
7.2 Customer-related processes
7.2.1 Determination of requirements related to the product
7.2.1 Determination of requirements related to the product (Notes 2 and 3)
7.2.1.1 Customer-designated special characteristics
7.2.2 Review of requirements related to the product
7.2.2.1 Review of requirements related to the product — Supplemental
7.2.2.2 Organization manufacturing feasibility
7.2.3 Customer communication
7.2.3.1 Customer communication — Supplemental
7.3 Design and development
7.3 Design and development (Note)
7.3.1 Design and development planning
7.3.1.1 Multidisciplinary approach
7.3.2 Design and development inputs
7.3.2.1 Product design input
7.3.2.2 Manufacturing process design input
7.3.2.3 Special characteristics
7.3.3 Design and development outputs
7.3.3.1 Product design outputs — Supplemental
7.3.3.2 Manufacturing process design output
7.3.4 Design and development review
7.3.4.1 Monitoring
7.3.5 Design and development verification
7.3.6 Design and development validation
7.3.6.1 Design and development validation — Supplemental
7.3.6.2 Prototype programme
7.3.6.3 Product approval process
7.3.7 Control of design and development changes
7.3.7 Control of design and development changes (Note)
7.4.1 Purchasing process
7.4.1 Purchasing process (Note 1)
7.4.1.1 Statutory and regulatory conformity
7.4.1.2 Supplier quality management system development
7.4.1.3 Customer-approved sources
7.4.2 Purchasing information
7.4.3 Verification of purchased product
7.4.3.1 Incoming product conformity to requirements
7.4.3.2 Supplier monitoring
7.5 Production and service provision
7.5.1 Control of production and service provision
7.5.1.1 Control plan
7.5.1.2 Work instructions
7.5.1.3 Verification of job set-ups
7.5.1.4 Preventive and predictive maintenance
7.5.1.5 Management of production tooling
7.5.1.6 Production scheduling
7.5.1.7 Feedback of information from service
7.5.1.8 Service agreement with customer
7.5.2 Validation of processes for production and service provision
7.5.3 Identification and traceability
7.5.3.1 Identification and traceability — Supplemental
7.5.4 Customer property
7.5.5 Preservation of product
7.5.5.1 Storage and inventory
7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment
7.6.1 Measurement system analysis
7.6.2 Calibration/verification records
7.6.3 Laboratory requirements
7.6.3.1 Internal laboratory
7.6.3.2 External laboratory
8.1.1 Identification of statistical tools
8.1.2 Knowledge of basic statistical concepts
8.2.1 Customer satisfaction
8.2.1.1 Customer satisfaction — Supplemental
8.2.2 Internal audit
8.2.2.1 Quality management system audit
8.2.2.2 Manufacturing process audit
8.2.2.3 Product audit
8.2.2.4 Internal audit plans
8.2.2.5 Internal auditor qualification
8.2.3 Monitoring and measurement of processes
8.2.3.1 Monitoring and measurement of manufacturing processes
8.2.4 Monitoring and measurement of product
8.2.4.1 Layout inspection and functional testing
8.2.4.2 Appearance items
8.3 Control of nonconforming product
8.3.1 Control of nonconforming product — Supplemental
8.3.2 Control of reworked product
8.3.3 Customer information
8.3.4 Customer waiver
8.4 Analysis of data
8.4.1 Analysis and use of data
8.5.1 Continual improvement
8.5.1.1 Continual improvement of the organization
8.5.1.2 Manufacturing process improvement
8.5.2 Corrective action
8.5.2.1 Problem solving
8.5.2.2 Error-proofing
8.5.2.4 Rejected product test/analysis
8.5.3 Preventive action
Annex A (normative) Control plan
Bibliography
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 0.1 General
These clauses are almost the same; the new version explains the context of the organization and its influence on the structure of the Quality Management System (QMS), while pointing out that the standard does not imply a need for uniformity in the structure of the QMS. Additionally, enhancing customer satisfaction is pointed out in this clause.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 0.3 Process Approach
The clause name is the same, but the 2016 revision has three sections that explain the process approach, PDCA cycle, and risk-based thinking. For more information, read
Plan-Do-Check-Act in the ISO 9001 standard
.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 0.4 Relationship With Other Management System Standards
This clause of the new version of the standard refers to ISO 9000, ISO 9004, and Annex B of the standard, which provide more details about other standards on quality management.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 1 Scope
This clause is almost the same for both versions of the standard.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 2 Normative references
These clauses are almost the same for both versions of the standard.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 2.1 Normative and informative references
These clauses are almost the same for both versions of the standard.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 3 Terms and definitions
The new version refers to ISO 9000:2015.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 4.3 Determining the scope of the quality management system
This requirement was related to the Quality Manual in the previous version. Now, there is only a requirement to document the scope.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 4.3.1 Determining the scope of the quality management system -supplemental
These requirements were originally included in ISO/TS 16949:2009 Sections 1.1 and 1.2. The first requirement was slightly revised to not only address the need to include supporting functions in the audit, but also to ensure that the supporting functions are also included in the scope of the QMS.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 4.4 Quality management system and its processes
The requirements from the previous version remain; the new requirements are related to determining the risks and opportunities, inputs and outputs of the processes, as well as assigning responsibilities and authorities for the processes.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 4.4.1.2 Product Safety
This is a new section with new and enhanced requirements that address current and emerging issues that the automotive industry is facing related to product and process safety. The list of items a) through n) requires that the organization addresses them in a documented and dedicated process for the management of product safety-related products and manufacturing processes.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 4.4.2 (clause does not have a title)
This is a new section with new and enhanced requirements that address current and emerging issues that the automotive industry is facing related to product and process safety. The list of items a) through n) requires that the organization addresses them in a documented and dedicated process for the management of product safety-related products and manufacturing processes.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.1 Leadership and commitment
The clauses are very similar; the emphasis in the new version is on promoting awareness and support of other persons who contribute to the effectiveness of the QMS. The main difference between the clauses is that the new version requires the top management to take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.1.1 General
The clauses are very similar; the emphasis in the new version is on promoting awareness and support of other persons who contribute to the effectiveness of the QMS. The main difference between the clauses is that the new version requires the top management to take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness and efficiency
The requirement to review the processes to ensure effectiveness and efficiency was covered in ISO/TS 16949, Section 5.1.1. Based on the IATF survey feedback, the IATF strengthened the requirement to ensure that the results of the review are now to be included in the management review.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.1.2 Customer Focus
The old requirements remain the same. Determination of the risks and opportunities regarding conformity of products and services is a new requirement, as well as the consideration of the statutory and regulatory requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.2 Policy
The requirements remain the same. An additional requirement is to be available to interested parties, as appropriate.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.2.1 Establishing the quality policy
The requirements remain the same. An additional requirement is to be available to interested parties, as appropriate.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.2.2 Communicating the quality policy
The requirements remain the same. An additional requirement is to be available to interested parties, as appropriate.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities, and authorities
The main difference is that the new standard does not require appointing a management representative; however, the new clause describes in more detail the roles, responsibilities, and authorities within the QMS, implying that they can be allocated to different persons.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.3.1 Organizational roles,
responsibilities, and authorities –
supplemental
This requirement was already part of ISO/TS 16949:2009. However, the IATF adopted some modifications to the requirement to address the need to document assigned personnel responsibilities and authorities. Additionally, it clarifies that the goal is not just to address customer requirements, but also to meet customer requirements fully.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 5.3.2 Responsibility and authority for product requirements and
corrective actions
The IATF adopted some enhancements to the requirement originally included in ISO/TS 16949 to address the need to explicitly make top management responsible for ensuring conformity to product requirements and to corrective actions taken.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 6.1.2.1 Risk analysis
The need to identify, analyze, and consider actual and potential risks was already covered in various areas of ISO/TS 16949. The IATF adopted the additional requirements for risk analysis recognizing the continual need to analyze and respond to risk and to have organizations consider specific risks associated with the automotive industry.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 6.1.2.2 Preventive action
The IATF enhanced the requirement found in ISO/TS 16949 by providing more detail regarding what is considered to be best practice in the automotive industry.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 6.1.2.3 Contingency plans
The IATF enhanced the requirement found in ISO/TS 16949 by providing more detail regarding what is considered to be best practice in the automotive industry. The expanded requirement ensures that the organization defines and prepares contingency plans, along with a notification process to the customer or other interested parties.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them
The requirements remain the same, but are further elaborated in the new version.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 6.2.1 (clause does not have a title)
The requirements remain the same, but are further elaborated in the new version.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 6.2.2 (clause does not have a title)
The requirements remain the same, but are further elaborated in the new version.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 6.2.2.1 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them – supplemental
ISO/TS 16949 included the importance of addressing customer expectations in the NOTE to Section 5.4.1.1. The IATF decided to enhance the requirement by including the NOTE in Section 6.2.2.1 and to require that it be done at all levels throughout the organization.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 6.3 Planning of Changes
The new version of the standard defines how the changes in the QMS should be managed by considering the purpose of the change, the potential consequences, availability of resources, and allocation of responsibilities.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1 Resources
The old requirements remain, but the new version emphasizes consideration of capabilities and constraints of the organization, as well as resources obtained from external providers.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.1 General
The old requirements remain, but the new version emphasizes consideration of capabilities and constraints of the organization, as well as resources obtained from external providers.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.2 People
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.3 Infrastructure
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.3.1 Plant, facility, and equipment planning
The new version puts increased focus on risk identification and risk mitigation, evaluating manufacturing feasibility, re-evaluation of changes in processes, and inclusion of on-site supplier activities.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.4 Environment for the operation of processes
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.4.1 Environment for the operation of processes – supplemental
The requirement was maintained from ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949, only moved to Section 7.1.4.1.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.5 Monitoring and measuring resources
The new version of the standard emphasizes the provision of resources for monitoring and measurement. The organization must retain the documented information as evidence of fitness for purpose of monitoring and measurement resources. The old standard only focuses on the measuring equipment.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.5.1 General
The new version of the standard emphasizes the provision of resources for monitoring and measurement. The organization must retain the documented information as evidence of fitness for purpose of monitoring and measurement resources. The old standard only focuses on the measuring equipment.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.5.1.1 Measurement system analysis
Records are now required for customer acceptance of alternative methods. See Annex B, which contains IATF-recommended tools for implementation.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.5.2 Measurement traceability
Records are now required for customer acceptance of alternative methods. See Annex B, which contains IATF-recommended tools for implementation.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.5.2.1 Calibration/verification records
Ensuring that customer requirements are met, and enhanced calibration / verification record retention requirements, including software installed on employee-owned or customer-owned equipment.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.5.3 Laboratory requirements
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.5.3.1 Internal laboratory
Added requirement to have the organization (client) define a methodology to verify measurement system capability if no national or international standard(s) exist.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.1.5.3.2 External laboratory
Allows the organization to conduct second-party assessments of laboratory facilities; however, requires customer approval of assessment method. Added government regulatory confirmation, if required.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.2 Competence
Competence and awareness are split into different clauses to emphasize their importance and provide more detailed requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.2.2 Competence – on the job training
Enhanced emphasis of on-the-job training and its importance in meeting customer requirements, including other interested parties.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.2.3 Internal auditor competency
Enhanced requirements for the organization's internal auditor competency requirements to ensure a more robust internal audit process.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.3 Awareness
Competence and awareness are split into different clauses to emphasize their importance and provide more detailed requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.3.1 Awareness – supplemental
Additional requirements to ensure all employees are aware of their impact on the organization’s (client’s) product quality output, customer-specific requirements, and risks involved for the customer with non-conforming product.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.3.2 Employee motivation and empowerment
Not a major change, just now requiring maintenance of a "documented process" for employee motivation and empowerment.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.4 Communication
The new clause includes both external and internal communication and requires definition of responsibility and methods of communication.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.5 Documented information
Documents and records now belong to the same category – documented information. The requirements of both versions are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.5.1 General
Documents and records now belong to the same category – documented information. The requirements of both versions are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.5.1.1 Quality Management System Documentation
Documents and records now belong to the same category – documented information. The requirements of both versions are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.5.2 Creating and updating
Documents and records now belong to the same category – documented information. The requirements of both versions are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.5.3 Control of documented information
Documents and records now belong to the same category – documented information. The requirements of both versions are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.5.3.1 (clause does not have a title)
Documents and records now belong to the same category – documented information. The requirements of both versions are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.5.3.2 (clause does not have a title)
Documents and records now belong to the same category – documented information. The requirements of both versions are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.5.3.2.1 Record retention
Requiring a record retention process that is defined and documented and that includes the organization’s record retention requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 7.5.3.2.2 Engineering specification
Added a requirement that the process is documented and agreed with the customer. Also, clarified product design changes and product realization process changes.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.1 Operational planning and control
The requirements of both clauses are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.1.1 Operational planning and control – supplemental
Enhanced detail to ensure key processes are included and considered when planning for product realization.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.1.2 Confidentiality
Minor editing, no major change in the intent of this section.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2 Requirements for products and services
The requirements are almost the same, but the new version emphasizes communication about treatment of customer property.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.1 Customer communication
The requirements are almost the same, but the new version emphasizes communication about treatment of customer property.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.1.1 Customer communication – supplemental
Added a requirement for a communication method (written or verbal) to be agreed with the customer.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.2 Determining the requirements for products and services
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.2.1 Determining the requirements for products and services – supplemental
Strengthened the standard by elevating Notes into requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.3 Review of the requirements for products and services
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.3.1 (clause does not have a title)
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.3.1.1 Review of the requirements for products and services – supplemental
Strengthens the requirement, stating that the organization is required to retain a documented customer authorization waiver.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.3.1.2 Customer designated special characteristics
Minor editing, no major change in the intent of this section.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.3.1.3 Organization manufacturing feasibility
Enhanced requirements for manufacturing feasibility analysis.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.2.3.2 (clause does not have a title)
Enhanced requirements for manufacturing feasibility analysis.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3 Design and development of products and services
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.1.1 Design and development of products and services – supplemental
Strengthened the standard by elevating the NOTE to a requirement, added a requirement for documentation of the design and development process.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.2 Design and development planning
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.2.1 Design and development planning – supplemental
Clarification of when the multi-disciplinary approach is to be used and who should be involved.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.2.2 Product design skills
NOTE added as an example of a product design skillset.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.3 Design and development inputs
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.3.1 Product design input
Expanded the minimum set of product design input requirements, emphasizing regulatory and software requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.3.2 Manufacturing process design input
Expanded the list of manufacturing process design inputs; further strengthened the requirement by putting the NOTE into a requirement.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.3.3 Special characteristics
Identify source of special characteristics; include risk analysis to be performed by the customer or the organization.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.4 Design and development controls
The new clause sublimates the requirements of the three old clauses, keeping the old requirements and emphasizing the consideration of nature, duration, and complexity of design and development activities.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.4.1 Monitoring
Aligned the IATF 16949 standard with IATF OEM advanced quality activities; reduced the customer-specific requirements and further clarified the NOTE.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.4.2 Design and development validation
Strengthening of requirements for design and development validation; also, added embedded software.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.4.3 Prototype programme
Strengthened the standard by focusing the organization on the Quality Management System for managing outsourced products and services.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.4.4 Product approval process
Clarified approval requirements with emphasis on outsourced products and/or services and record retention required.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.5 Design and development outputs
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.5.1 Design and development outputs – supplemental
Recognition of the use of 3D models; inclusion of service parts and packaging.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.5.2 Manufacturing process design output
Strengthened verification requirements, process input variables, capacity analysis, maintenance plans, and correction of process nonconformities.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.6 Design and development changes
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.3.6.1 Design and development changes – supplemental
Strengthened requirement for change validation and approval prior to implementation and added embedded software.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4 Control of externally provided processes, products and services
Although the name of the clause has changed, the requirements are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.1 General
Although the name of the clause has changed, the requirements are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.1.1 General – supplemental
Strengthened the IATF 16949 standard by elevating the NOTE to a requirement.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.1.3 Customer-directed sources (also known as “Direct-Buy”)
Clarification of organization’s responsibilities for customer-directed sources, even for Direct-Buy.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.2 Type and extent of control
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.2.1 Type and extent of control – supplemental
Further strengthened the requirement for control of outsourced processes, including the assessment of risk.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.2.2 Statutory and regulatory requirements
Further strengthened requirements; clarified applicability of statutory and regulatory requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.2.3 Supplier quality management system development
Provides a method to strengthen ISO 9001 certification; alignment of customer-specific requirements; clarification of acceptable third-party certification bodies (recognized by the IATF).
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.2.4 Supplier monitoring
Strengthened requirements for supplier monitoring.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.2.5 Supplier development
Emphasis on performance-based supplier development actions.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.4.3 Information for external providers
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same. The new version emphasizes the monitoring and control of external providers’ performance.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5 Production and service provision
The requirements are almost the same, but the new standard points out that the implemented controlled conditions are for delivery and post-delivery activities.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.1 Control of production and service provision
The requirements are almost the same, but the new standard points out that the implemented controlled conditions are for delivery and post-delivery activities.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.1.1 Control plan
Strengthened control plan requirements and aligned IATF OEM customer-specific requirements into the IATF 16949 standard. Elevated NOTE to a requirement; strengthened control plan review and update criteria and linked to PFMEA update.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.1.2 Standardized work – operator instructions and visual standards
Strengthened requirements for standardized work, including the requirement to address specific language needs.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.1.3 Verification of job set-ups
Elevated NOTE to a requirement; clarified record retention.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.1.5 Total productive maintenance
Strengthened the requirement for equipment maintenance and overall proactive management of the total productive maintenance.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.1.6 Management of production tooling and manufacturing, test, inspection tooling and equipment
Strengthened tooling and equipment marking and tracking requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.1.7 Production scheduling
Emphasized the importance of planning information; integrated IATF OEM customer lessons learned.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.2 Identification and traceability
The requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.2.1 Identification and traceability – supplemental
Strengthened requirements for traceability to support industry lessons learned related to field issues.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.3 Property belonging to customers or external providers
The requirements of both clauses are the same, but in the new standard the requirements are extended to property belonging to external providers as well.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.4 Preservation
The requirements of both clauses are the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.4.1 Preservation – supplemental
Added specificity to preservation controls and included application to internal and/or external providers.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.5.1 Feedback of information from service
Expanded scope to include material handling and logistics.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.5.2 Service agreement with customer
Clarification of service agreement requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.5.6.1 Control of changes – supplemental
Strengthened the standard to align with existing IATF OEM requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.6.2 Layout inspection and functional testing
Clarified that the frequency of layout inspections is determined by the customer.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.6.3 Appearance items
Inclusion of haptic technology, as appropriate, for appearance items.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.6.4 Verification and acceptance of conformity of externally provided products and services
Alignment with ISO 9001:2015 terminology; clarification of source of statistical data.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.6.5 Statutory and regulatory conformity
Strengthened standard for statutory and regulatory conformity to require evidence of compliance.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.6.6 Acceptance criteria
Minor editing, no major change in the intent of this section.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7 Control of nonconforming outputs
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7.1 (clause does not have a title)
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7.1.1 Customer authorization for concession
Alignment of terminology; clarification of concessions applied to rework of nonconforming product and sub-component reuse.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7.1.2 Control of nonconforming product – customer-specified process
Ensures customer-controlled shipping requirements are followed.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7.1.3 Control of suspect product
Strengthened requirements by ensuring that containment training is implemented.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7.1.4 Control of reworked product
Expanded scope to include: customer approval, risk assessment, rework confirmation, traceability, and retention of documented information.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7.1.5 Control of repaired product
Clarified the requirement and the need for follow up with detailed information for reworked product.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7.1.6 Customer notification
New automotive requirement to address modifications in ISO 9001 requirements and address customer issues for IATF OEM concerns.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7.1.7 Nonconforming product disposition
Strengthened the requirement of disposition of nonconforming product.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 8.7.2 (clause does not have a title)
Strengthened the requirement of disposition of nonconforming product.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
The new clause sublimates all requirements for processes and products / services monitoring and measurement.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.1.1 General
The new clause sublimates all requirements for processes and products / services monitoring and measurement.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.1.1.1 Monitoring and measurement of manufacturing processes
Clarification of the requirement for targeting process effectiveness and efficiency. Extension of the requirement to have effective and efficient processes instead of just having a process. Ensures that organizations support the manufacturing process through defined roles, responsibilities, and effective escalation processes to drive process capability and stability.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.1.1.2 Identification of statistical controls
Clarification regarding documented deployment of the use of statistical tools from DFMEA, PFMEA, and the APQP (or equivalent) process.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.1.1.3 Application of statistical concepts
Clarification regarding requirements for those involved in capturing and analyzing data; previously driven across all employees regardless of relevance.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.1.2 Customer satisfaction
The requirements are the same.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.1.2.1 Customer satisfaction – supplemental
Clarification of customer satisfaction monitoring criteria and introduction of additional focus on warranty management. Additional focus of the requirement to ensure all customer performance measures are regularly reviewed to reduce the risk of failure to achieve customer satisfaction.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.1.3 Analysis and evaluation
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.1.3.1 Prioritization
Emphasis change from ISO/TS 16949 “Analysis of data" to prioritization of actions based on performance and risk management.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.2 Internal audit
The requirements are equivalent. The main difference is that the new standard does not require a documented procedure. See the sample document here:
Procedure for Internal Audit
. For more information, read
Five Main Steps in ISO 9001 Internal Audit
.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.2.1 (clause does not have a title)
The requirements are equivalent. The main difference is that the new standard does not require a documented procedure. See the sample document here:
Procedure for Internal Audit
. For more information, read
Five Main Steps in ISO 9001 Internal Audit
.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.2.2 (clause does not have a title)
The requirements are equivalent. The main difference is that the new standard does not require a documented procedure. See the sample document here:
Procedure for Internal Audit
. For more information, read
Five Main Steps in ISO 9001 Internal Audit
.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.2.2.1 Internal audit programme
Strengthened the need to drive a risk-based approach to the development and deployment of an organization-wide internal audit program.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.2.2.2 Quality management system audit
Strengthened the Quality Management System audit and the use of the process approach; further drives process improvements organization-wide.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.2.2.3 Manufacturing process audit
Strengthened the formal approaches to ensure that the benefits of effective manufacturing process audits are achieved by organizations.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.2.2.4 Product audit
Strengthened the product audit requirements to include customer-specified approaches.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.3 Management review
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.3.1 General
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.3.1.1 Management review – supplemental
Strengthened the organization's management review requirements, including assessment of risk and compliance with customer requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.3.2 Management review inputs
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.3.2.1 Management review inputs – supplemental
Enhanced details for management review input requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.3.3. Management review outputs
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 9.3.3.1 Management review outputs – supplemental
Enhanced to ensure action is taken where customer requirements are not achieved; supports continual analysis of process performance and risk.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 10.2.1 (clause does not have a title)
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 10.2.2 (clause does not have a title)
The requirements are equivalent.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 10.2.3 Problem solving
Consolidation of IATF OEM customer-specific minimum requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 10.2.4 Error-proofing
Previously, only mentioned the use of error-proofing methods in corrective action; new requirements strengthen the approach to error-proofing and consolidate customer-specific requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 10.2.6 Customer complaints and field failure test analysis
Adds a new requirement regarding embedded software and identification of preferred approaches.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 10.3 Continual improvement
The new standard points out the need to use all available information for continually improving the QMS.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - 10.3.1 Continual improvement – supplemental
Clarification of the minimum process requirements.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - Annex A: Control Plan
The new version provides more details about how to develop the Control Plan.
Corresponding clause in IATF 16949:2016 - Annex B: Bibliography – supplemental automotive
The bibliography provides information on additional documents that can be useful during the implementation, maintenance, and auditing of the QMS.
Contact Information