Abstract Scoring Sheet: Resident Poster Contest

RPC

Please rate the assigned abstracts on a continuum of not-sufficient to excellent.


Note: Residents were limited to a 1-page submission and were not required to include references or images during this round.


Consider the following criteria as you review both research and case reports:

  • Clarity in the research and/or clinical question, study design and discussion/conclusion
  • Originality of the project or question
  • Relevance to family medicine
  • Impact on future work
  • Potential to improve patient care or resident skills, knowledge and performance



  • Missing information
  • Unclear or poorly stated
  • Poorly designed
  • Little to no impact
  • Not relevant
  • Moderately clear
  • Adequately stated, but could be improved
  • Adequately structured
  • Some potential for impact
  • Somewhat relevant
  • Complete and well-written
  • Clearly designed
  • Correctly applied methods
  • Strong impact
  • Relevant
Not Sufficient (1) Satisfactory (2) Good (3) Excellent (4)


  • Missing information
  • Unclear, difficult to follow
  • Poorly stated
  • Does not expand knowledge
  • Not relevant
  • Sufficient information
  • Moderately clear
  • Adequately stated, but could be improved
  • Moderate learning value
  • Somewhat relevant
  • Complete and well-written
  • Clearly presented and completely stated
  • High learning value
  • Relevant
Not Sufficient (1) Satisfactory (2) Good (3) Excellent (4)